Wednesday, April 10, 2013
President Proposes $300 Million For GLRI Programs
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Interactive Map Of Great Lakes Restoration Work
When county or congressional district boundaries are turned on, the map shows what county a project is located in or which Member of Congress represents the district and the percentage of the district that lies within the Great Lakes Basin. The project table "disaggregates" programs to show separate on-the-ground projects, versus showing a grant program managed by an agency or organization. For example, the map shows separate contaminated sediment cleanups implemented under the Great Lakes Legacy Act program.
The website emphasizes on-the-ground actions and does not include some projects focused on research, monitoring, public education and other broad-scale activities not focused on a specific site. The project locations may represent a specific site or the watershed in which restoration work is being conducted. In some cases the site is the
location of the lead agency. The Commission has also produced state-specific factsheets showcasing how the GLRI is benefiting each of the eight Great Lakes states.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Environmental Groups Say EPA's Vessel Permit Is Too Weak
The environmental groups indicated in a release that invasive species introduced and spread via ballast water discharge are already wreaking havoc on U.S. waters. For example, a litany of non-native invaders -- including zebra mussels, quagga mussels, spiny water fleas and round gobies -- have turned the Great Lakes ecosystem on its head, altering the food web and threatening the health of native fish and wildlife. Non-native ballast water invaders cost Great Lakes citizens, utilities, cities and businesses at least $1 billion every five years in damages and control costs, according to research by the University of Notre Dame. Invasive species exact similar significant economic costs throughout American waterways and on both coasts.
They said despite the significant regional economic drain brought about by invasive species, the EPA permit fails to deliver strict enough standards to protect the nation's waters, choosing instead to adopt weak International Marine Organizations (IMO) standards. While there is no hard deadline for ships to install systems to clean ballast water, EPA "expects" that the process will take a half-decade to complete.
Previously, the groups called for the new permit to include a discharge standard stringent enough to prevent invasive species and the most protective technology standards nationwide, develop standards for "lakers" (ships that ply the Great Lakes) and put more aggressive timelines to implement new technology standards into place. None of these actions were taken, leaving American waters at risk. Groups issuing the release included: the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC); National Wildlife Federation's (NWF) Great Lakes office; Northwest Environmental Advocates; Great Lakes United; and the Alliance for the Great Lakes.
Rebecca Riley, attorney for NRDC said, The Clean Water Act gives the EPA authority to stop invasive species from entering the Great Lakes in ballast water---they just chose not to use it. This failure threatens our economy and the single most important freshwater resource on the continent." Marc Smith, senior policy manager for NWF's Great Lakes office said, "The permit will not adequately protect the Great Lakes and other U.S. waters from ballast water invaders. The EPA's failure to protect water quality leaves the door open for future harm to our environment and economy."
Access a release from the groups (click here). Access links to a 1-page fact sheet and the complete prepublication federal register notice, general permit and economic analysis (click here). Access EPA's overall Vessel Discharge website for more information(click here). [#Water, #GLakes]
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Groups Petition For Moratorium & New Pipeline Regs
Beth Wallace with the Great Lakes Regional Center said, "Three years after the largest inland oil spill in U.S. history, little has been done to improve pipeline safety. This disaster should have been a wake-up call to industry, regulators and public officials. Instead industry is being allowed to expand pipelines across the region and even under the Great Lakes themselves, which will continue to put communities, wildlife and our economy at risk."
- Stronger safety requirements than those for conventional crude oil;
- Industry disclosure of products carried through pipelines and their conveyance schedules;
- Stronger industry spill response plans;
- Shut-down requirements upon the first indication of a leak or other pipeline failure;
- Repair of pipelines as soon as defects are discovered;
- Transparent pipeline inspection reporting; and
- Pipeline inspection and monitoring by independent entities unaffiliated with pipeline or energy companies;
- A moratorium on building new or expanded tar sands pipelines until new regulations are final.
EPA Issues A Final Vessel General Permit
- Reduce the risks of introduction of invasive species
Friday, March 22, 2013
Settlement Would End S.S. Badger Coal Ash Discharge
EPA Region 5 Administrator Susan Hedman said, "This consent decree offers the fastest and most certain path available to EPA to stop the discharge of coal ash from the Badger into Lake Michigan. The enforcement agreement reduces the discharge of coal ash more quickly and with greater oversight than would occur during the appeal of a decision to issue or deny a permit -- a process that often takes several years." The S.S. Badger was authorized to discharge coal ash under the 2008 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Vessel General Permit. A permit provision authorized that discharge until December 2012. The S.S. Badger is the last coal-fired ship operating on the Great Lakes.
Last year, LMC applied for an individual NPDES permit to allow the S.S. Badger to continue discharging coal ash into Lake Michigan. In light of the settlement announced, EPA does not plan to make a decision on that permit application. DOJ and EPA will accept and consider comments on the proposed consent decree during a 30-day public comment period, to be announced shortly in the Federal Register. The proposed consent decree is available now on the DOJ website (see below).
Access a release from EPA (click here). Access the legal complaint filed in Federal Court (click here). Access the proposed consent decree (click here). Access extensive background and a chronology on the S.S. Badger issue from EPA (click here). [GLakes, #Toxics, #Water]