Joel Brammeier, President and CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes said, "Extraordinary evidence demands extraordinary solutions, and the evidence is piling up in favor of separation. Declaring independence between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River is the only option." Robert Hirschfeld of Prairie Rivers Network said, "The artificial connection between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River is a revolving door for wave after wave of invasive species to infest the 30 states of the Mississippi River Basin and do untold ecological and economic damage."
Friday, July 1, 2011
Scientists Address Great Lakes & Mississippi River Basins Separation
Jul 1: A group of Great Lakes  and Mississippi River scientists have published a technical paper in the Journal  of Great Lakes Research entitled, Dividing the waters: The case for  hydrologic separation of the North American Great Lakes and Mississippi River  Basins. According to an abstract, legislation has been introduced this year  in the U.S. Congress, but not yet enacted, that would direct the U.S. Army Corps  of Engineers to complete a study of the options that would prevent the spread of  aquatic nuisance species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins.                  
    The abstract  indicates that, "Hydrologic separation is the only option which closes the  aquatic connection between the two basins and does not require continuous  operation and maintenance of various technologies that have some risk of  failure. The one-time, capital cost to separate the two basins is widely  acknowledged to be high, and the outstanding question is whether the costs are  justified given the significant risk of future ecological damages and long-term  economic losses. Interests opposing separation have mounted a public campaign  that the news media have picked up to deny that hydrologic separation should be  considered or that a problem even exists."
     The abstract  continues, "The campaign rests on four assertions: (1) existing electric  barriers in the Chicago canals are effective; (2) it is too late -- the carps  are already in the Great Lakes or soon will be; (3) Asian carps will not thrive  in the Great Lakes due to inadequate food and spawning habitat; and (4) Asian  carps are unlikely to cause serious harm. Our review of these assertions and the  ecological and socio-economic threats to both basins supports our recommendation  that the pending legislation be passed and that it include analysis of  hydrologic separation of the two basins." The scientists indicate in the paper  that the potential victims of the current campaign to discredit proposals to  separate the basins are the 40 million in the region who look to the Great Lakes  for everything from drinking water to recreation to economic stability, as well  as those living throughout the Mississippi River Basin already damaged by the  zebra mussel and other southbound invaders from the Great Lakes. 
     A number of environmental organizations issued a release on the paper  indicating that the "researchers affirm what the environmental community  has been urging even before the first November 2009 Asian carp DNA find inside  an electric barrier that serves as the last line of defense between the Great  Lakes and carp-riddled Mississippi River Basin." They said, "As the U.S. Army  Corps of Engineers stalls on congressionally ordered studies to find a permanent  solution -- resorting to fish kills and other short-term tactics to stop the  carp's lakeward migration -- environmentalists and a growing chorus of lawmakers  continue to push for physically separating the two  basins."
Joel Brammeier, President and CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes said, "Extraordinary evidence demands extraordinary solutions, and the evidence is piling up in favor of separation. Declaring independence between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River is the only option." Robert Hirschfeld of Prairie Rivers Network said, "The artificial connection between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River is a revolving door for wave after wave of invasive species to infest the 30 states of the Mississippi River Basin and do untold ecological and economic damage."
 Joel Brammeier, President and CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes said, "Extraordinary evidence demands extraordinary solutions, and the evidence is piling up in favor of separation. Declaring independence between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River is the only option." Robert Hirschfeld of Prairie Rivers Network said, "The artificial connection between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River is a revolving door for wave after wave of invasive species to infest the 30 states of the Mississippi River Basin and do untold ecological and economic damage."
    The groups issuing  the joint release on the scientific paper included: Alliance for the Great  Lakes; Freshwater Future; Great Lakes United; Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes  Coalition; National Wildlife Federation; Natural Resources Defense Council;  Prairie Rivers Network; and Sierra Club.
     Access a release from the groups  (click here). Access the Journal of Great Lakes  Research with abstract and information on obtaining the paper  (click here). Access an online posting of paper from Michigan State  University (click here). Access a fact  sheet on the scientists' paper from the organizations (click  here). 
  GET  THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
 For a limited time period  -- THIS IS THE LAST DAY -- you can  access today's complete issue of eNewsUSA without the links http://bit.ly/kPRdso.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)














1 comment:
Great Lakes Environment,
I have a quick question about your site, please email me back as soon as possible!
Barbara
bobrien@mesothelioma.com
Post a Comment